Also, general intelligence, go read about that on Wikipedia, a real journey. For me, it looks like the "power law" it has little mechanistic insight into cognition. It might be the chess player rating version of cognitive sciences measures. The invariant quantity.... (or instantaneous forehead stamp value). If something ought to be multidimensional even more than chess, that would be that blob of a concept.
Expecting magical correlation between 2 floating measures, does not seem that rational. We already know about the pool dependency of one, then how would that relate to dimensionless 1 dimension projection of many dimensions of psychometrics?
One thing is always true, with all full definitions made visible, we can 100% say that each 1D thing is measuring what they measure, by their definition, the interpretation, on the other hand, might not be a science from there. Feels good to say grounded things once in a while.
Expecting magical correlation between 2 floating measures, does not seem that rational. We already know about the pool dependency of one, then how would that relate to dimensionless 1 dimension projection of many dimensions of psychometrics?
One thing is always true, with all full definitions made visible, we can 100% say that each 1D thing is measuring what they measure, by their definition, the interpretation, on the other hand, might not be a science from there. Feels good to say grounded things once in a while.